LETTING OTHERS DRIVE YOUR CAR COULD COST YOU DEARLY

Jason B. Goldman • June 29, 2015
LETTING OTHERS DRIVE YOUR CAR COULD COST YOU DEARLY

The seemingly simple choice of whose name(s) to place as the owner of an automobile on its Certificate of Title has substantial legal ramifications that non-attorneys rarely consider, or even realize exist in the first place. These ramifications will not be explained to you at the tag and registration office by a County employee, or by your automobile insurance agent when you purchase your automobile insurance. As you likely know, when purchasing a new or used vehicle, you are asked at the time of purchase whose name(s) you would like to appear on the Certificate of Title. It is therefore important to know the legal effects of how you elect to title your vehicle before you actually make the vehicle purchase. I’ll begin with 4 important general rules and tips to follow, and then explain why these choices are so important.

4 Important General Rules, Examples, and Tips:

  1. The fewer names on a car title, the better. Under the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine, which will be explained below, only persons whose names are listed on the car’s Certificate of Title are liable for injuries caused by the negligent use of the vehicle. If there’s only one owner of a car, then only that person (in addition to the actual driver of the vehicle who caused the accident which brought about injuries) can be held accountable for its negligent use.
  2. A common error made by couples (married, civil union, engaged, or otherwise) is putting both spouses’s names on the titles of each and every vehicle they own. Very simply, the name of the person who predominantly drives a particular vehicle within a household should be the only name listed on the Certificate of Title for that vehicle.
  3. When buying a car for a child under 18 years of age, only title it in the name of one parent, not both. In choosing which parent’s name to place as Owner on the Certificate of Title, choose the parent whose income and assets are less than the other. And finally, once the child turns 18 years of age, title to the vehicle should immediately be transferred into the name of the child alone.
  4. Another issue regarding children and parental responsibility for their negligent driving actions: Pursuant to Section 322.09(2) of the Florida Statutes (1997), the parent who signs the driver’s license application for a minor child can be held liable for the child’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle regardless of whether that parent’s name is on the vehicle title of the car being driven by the minor who causes an accident with injuries. As such, the parent who takes their minor child to the driver’s license office should be the parent whose income and assets are less than the other parent. This legal responsibility ends, however, when the child reaches 18.

Prior to reading this article, most people incorrectly believe that simply letting someone run a quick errand with their car, or just putting their name on the title of a newly purchased car for someone else’s benefit (usually for vehicle finance purposes), somehow releases them from liability in the event of an accident. The thought process goes something like “How can I be held responsible if I loan my car to my friend, and she causes an accident with injuries on her way to the Town Center Mall?” or “I only put my name on the title to help my (insert friend/son/daughter here) get financing, but once the car was purchased they knew it was their responsibility from that point forward.” These mistaken beliefs have undoubtedly cost countless Florida citizens thousands of dollars and, in some instances, their actual legal right to drive.

Florida’s “Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine” is what makes the seemingly simple choice of how to title your vehicle(s) so incredibly important to you and your family’s financial security. Stated simply, Florida’s Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine means that the owner of an item which has been deemed “inherently dangerous” by statute or Florida’s courts is liable for any injuries caused by that object’s negligent use, even if it used by someone other than its actual legal owner (provided the owner gave the user consent to use the object). In 1920, Florida’s Supreme Court held for the first time that an automobile would from that point forward be considered a dangerous instrumentality. Other items which have also been held by Florida’s Supreme Court to be dangerous instrumentalities are forklifts, cranes used at construction sites, guns, airplanes, motorcycles, and boats.

I trust you are now beginning to realize, for the very first time, the extreme importance of limiting the number of person’s names that appear as “Owner” on your car’s Certificate of Title. If you allow another person to drive your car in the State of Florida, each and every owner listed on your car’s Certificate of Title is legally responsible for any injuries suffered by another motorist, bicyclist, pedestrian, or motorcyclist which were caused by the negligent operation of your car by the person you allowed to drive your car. As I tell my own clients, when you lend your car to someone and they cause an accident, it’s as if you (and everyone else whose name is on the vehicle’s title) were driving and caused the accident yourself.

There are incredibly limited exceptions to the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine, which are:

  1. The “Shop Rule”: Under the “Shop Rule,” the owner of a vehicle dropped at a service station for repairs is not responsible for the negligent driving of a repair shop employee. This exception also extends to valet parking.
  2. Car rental and car leasing companies: When you lease a vehicle from a rental or leasing agency, the vehicle’s title stays in the name of the rental or leasing company. Nonetheless, the rental or leasing company is not liable for your negligent use of that automobile under the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine.
  3. Sale of your vehicle: If you sell your car and the buyer causes an accident which brings about injuries before having a reasonable chance to formally change the title, you can possibly escape responsibility under the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine.

At this point, you may be breathing a bit more deeply than usual with a bead of sweat running down your brow, and vowing immediately to go look at the titles of all the vehicles in your household. That’s the most common reaction of people who hear this information for the very first time. But don’t worry – in addition to providing useful information, we at Goldman, Tiseo & Sturges, P.A. also enjoy providing solutions!

Putting these general rules and tips into action, let’s presume we have a traditional married couple in their 40s with a 17 year old daughter and 16 year old son. Dad is a physician, while Mom elected to stay home with her children as they grew up, but recently took a part-time job in an accountant’s office. Dad, Mom, and both children have their own vehicles, i.e. while everyone occasionally uses the other vehicles in the household, each person predominantly uses one vehicle they call “their own”. The vehicles should be titled as follows:

Dad’s car: Dad’s name only
Mom’s car: Mom’s name only
17 year old daughter’s car: Mom’s name only (transferred to daughter at 18)
16 year old son’s car: Mom’s name only (transferred to son at 18)

Despite learning this important information, many people still do not make the appropriate changes to the ownership listed on their household automobiles’ Certificates of Title. Generally, this inaction is usually based on the inconvenience of waiting in line at the tag/registration office to make the necessary changes, or a bit of doubt as to whether, in the “real world”, people whose names show up on car titles actually get sued and are found liable for accidents even though they had nothing to do with the actual accident. Rest assured this happens each and everyday, and has since Florida’s Supreme Court found automobiles to be dangerous instrumentalities in 1920. This is the rule, not the exception!

For a striking example as to the lengths Florida’s Supreme Court will uphold the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine, simply go online and read the case of Christensen v. Bowen, a 2014 case recently decided by the Florida Supreme Court. The case facts are straight-forward. Robert Christensen bought a car and placed both his and his wife’s name, Mary Taylor-Christensen, as Owner on the vehicle’s Certificate of Title. Mr. Christensen did this even though he and his wife were actively seeking a divorce from one another, and were not living together. He testified that when the vehicle was purchased, he intended it as a gift for his wife and, in effect, it was her vehicle even though his name was listed on the Certificate of Title in addition to hers. Further evidence demonstrated that Mr. Christensen immediately mailed the Certificate of Title to his wife’s address in order for her to change the title over to her own name. Mr. Christensen did not have a key to the vehicle, did not use the vehicle, or even have access to where the vehicle was kept. Approximately 22 months after the vehicle was purchased, Ms. Taylor-Christensen still had not yet gotten around to transferring the vehicle’s title into her own name. Tragically, she negligently drove the vehicle 22 months after it was purchased, with her husband’s name still firmly affixed as Co-Owner on the Certificate of Title, and killed Thomas Brown in a frightening automobile accident. The Personal Representative of Thomas Brown’s estate thereafter sued both Ms. Taylor-Christensen and Mr. Christensen for Thomas Brown’s death.

The case proceeded all the way to the Florida Supreme Court. Despite the overwhelming evidence that Mr. Christensen and his wife were actively engaged in a divorce proceeding when the vehicle was purchased, they were not living together, the vehicle was intended as a gift for Ms. Taylor-Christensen, Mr. Christensen immediately mailed the Certificate of Title to his wife’s address in order for her to change the title over to her own name, and Mr. Christensen neither had a key to the vehicle, ever used the vehicle, nor even had access to where the vehicle was kept, the Florida Supreme Court ruled this evidence insufficient as a matter of law to rebut the effect of the Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine. Consequently, Mr. Christensen was held liable, in addition to his now ex-wife, for the wrongful death of Thomas Brown.

Please review your vehicle titles, drive safely, be careful who you allow to drive your household’s automobiles, and make sure to carry an appropriate level of automobile insurance coverage in case tragedy strikes in the form of a serious automobile accident. When you allow another person to drive your automobile, their seemingly simple drive to the Promenades Mall, Fishermen’s Village, or Englewood Beach can have dire financial consequences to you if an automobile accident occurs.

If you have additional questions regarding the topic of this blog post, I would be happy to speak with you.

Share This Post:

By Jason B. Goldman November 15, 2024
Car accidents often focus on the drivers involved, but what happens if you were a passenger during the incident? Understanding your rights and options is crucial if you find yourself injured while a passenger. At GTS Law Firm, we provide the insights and legal guidance you may need after such an unfortunate event. Elements of Negligence in a Car Accident In Florida, determining negligence is essential for any car accident compensation claim. Whether you were a passenger or a driver, the fundamental principles of negligence remain the same: Duty of Care: Every driver on the road owes a duty of care to other road users, including their passengers. Breach of Duty: This is established when a driver engages in behaviors that violate this responsibility—be it through distracted driving, intoxication, or other reckless actions. Causation: The injuries sustained by the passenger must be directly linked to the breach of duty.  Damages: There must be verifiable damages that resulted from the accident, such as medical bills or lost earnings. When Can a Passenger Sue the Driver? As a passenger, there are several scenarios where you might have a valid claim against the driver: Driving Under the Influence: If the driver was intoxicated, proving negligence becomes relatively more straightforward. Reckless or Aggressive Driving: This includes speeding, erratic lane changes, or aggressive maneuvers. Distracted Driving: Involvement in activities such as texting, eating, or using a phone that leads to an accident can all constitute negligence. Violation of Traffic Laws: Such as running stop signs or red lights, or making illegal turns. Exceptions to Filing a Lawsuit as a Passenger There are, however, certain circumstances under Florida law where a passenger might be unable to sue the driver: The Driver Is Not at Fault: If another driver or an external factor caused the accident, the passenger might need to seek compensation from other parties. Household Exclusions: Some insurance policies might prevent a passenger from suing a driver who lives in the same household. Minimal Fault: In Florida, even if the passenger is partially at fault (e.g., not wearing a seatbelt), they can still seek compensation, but it may be reduced by their percentage of fault. Understanding Florida’s Car Insurance Laws Florida’s insurance requirements mandate that drivers carry a minimum of $10,000 in personal injury protection (PIP) and $10,000 in property damage liability (PDL). As a passenger, you may claim under the PIP coverage of the driver's insurance policy, up to the limits of their policy. The Role of a Skilled Florida Car Accident Lawyer Navigating post-accident legal options can be overwhelming, particularly when trying to recover from injuries. Here at GTS Law Firm, we understand the complexities involved in car accident claims and are prepared to guide you through each step of your legal journey. If you or a loved one has been injured as a passenger in a car accident, it is vital to seek experienced legal counsel promptly. Our team is here to help ensure that your rights are protected and that you receive the compensation you deserve. To discuss your case and explore your options, contact GTS Law Firm today at (941) 625-6666.
By Jason B. Goldman November 15, 2024
At Goldman Tiseo Sturges, P.A., understanding the concerns of our neighbors in Port Charlotte, Punta Gorda, Englewood, and North Port is at the heart of what we do. We've noticed that a common concern among Floridians dealing with insurance claims is the time it takes for an investigation to conclude. It’s a pivotal period, filled with uncertainty, where the right guidance can make all the difference. Florida’s Insurance Investigation Timeline: What You Need to Know For those navigating the aftermath of an accident, timing is critical. In Florida, the law mandates personal injury protection (PIP) for all drivers, a coverage meant to ensure medical bills and lost wages are covered to a degree, regardless of who's at fault. But what happens when the claim seems to linger in limbo? Investigation Periods Defined: While PIP claims necessitate action within 30 days, the breadth of insurance claims—from automobile accidents to wrongful death—often fall under the "reasonable amount of time" category. This lack of specificity can be frustrating, yet it's where a dedicated legal team becomes indispensable. Taking the Next Step If you're facing delays in your insurance claim or simply seeking guidance on how to proceed, Goldman Tiseo Sturges, P.A. is here to illuminate your path forward. With our comprehensive understanding of Florida insurance laws and a personalized approach to legal representation, we strive to streamline your experience, aiming for the resolution you deserve. For a free personal injury consultation, reach out at 941-625-6666. Let's navigate the complexities of your insurance claim together, ensuring justice and peace for you and your family.
By Jason B. Goldman October 16, 2024
Navigating the roads of Charlotte County involves more than just knowing your turns and local shortcuts. In a bid to enhance road safety, Florida’s Hands-Free Laws have been a pivotal shift in driving practices across the state, especially in Charlotte County. Given the dramatic consequences of distracted driving, understanding and abiding by these laws isn’t just about avoiding fines—it’s about safeguarding lives. Understanding Charlotte County's Hands-Free Laws In Charlotte County, like in all of Florida, Hands-Free Laws are operational and fairly stringent. These laws unequivocally bar the use of handheld electronic devices while driving a vehicle. This means no texting, calling, or browsing on your phone when you’re behind the wheel—unless you're using hands-free technology. Emphasizing the critical need to keep your hands on the wheel and your focus on the road, the local enforcement agencies are particularly vigilant in No Device Zones, such as school zones and construction sites. In these areas, even hands-free operation is discouraged to minimize distractions. The Why Behind the Law The implementation of these laws wasn't an overnight decision. With distracted driving ranking as a prime contributor to traffic incidents in Charlotte County, the step towards a mandatory hands-free driving environment was essential. The statistics don’t lie—distractions on the road are a leading factor in accidents, many of which have led to severe injuries and even fatalities. Compliance Isn't Complicated Here are a couple of straightforward tips for Charlotte County residents to adhere to the Hands-Free laws: Invest in Hands-Free Technology: Products like Bluetooth-enabled devices, which allow voice commands for calling and texting, can help you stay connected responsibly. GPS Setup Pre-Drive: Always enter your destination and review your route on your GPS device before you start driving. This prevents you from having to adjust your route mid-journey. Local Impact and Real Stories In Charlotte County, the effects of these laws are palpable. Local police reports and accident data indicate a downswing in distracted driving-related incidents since the laws took full effect. The community’s anecdotal evidence, gathered from forums and social media, reinforces this trend, painting a picture of increasingly safe roads. Engaging the Community Charlotte County’s approach isn’t just about laying down the law; it's also about increasing awareness. Through public campaigns and school programs, the aim is to engrain the principles of safe driving in both new and seasoned drivers. These initiatives use real-life stories and statistical data to underscore the potentially devastating impact of distracted driving. A Safer Charlotte County For residents of Charlotte County, the message is clear: the hands-free laws are not merely legal requirements, they are essential protocols to ensure everyone’s safety on the road. While it might take some getting used to, the shift to hands-free driving supports a safer, more attentive driving environment. By keeping informed and compliant, Charlotte County residents not only avoid penalties but contribute to a culture of responsivity and safety that benefits the entire community. Embrace the change, enhance safety, and keep Charlotte County’s roads safer for everyone. Together, let’s drive towards a less distracted future.
By Jason B. Goldman October 16, 2024
In the picturesque landscapes of Charlotte County, where our roads beckon locals and visitors alike to explore the splendor within, the question of road safety invariably arises, especially after a car accident. When versions of events clash, and the truth seems as elusive as the horizon at dusk, many of our neighbors find themselves pondering: Do traffic cameras record in Charlotte County, Florida? At Goldman, Tiseo & Sturges, P.A., deeply embedded in the heart of Charlotte County's community, we understand the critical importance of uncovering factual evidence to support your claim. Below, we delve into the nuances of traffic camera recordings, offering clarity on when, what, and how they record, as well as their pivotal role in accident claims. Types of Traffic Cameras in Charlotte County Much like the vigilant eyes of a lighthouse guiding ships safely to shore, our traffic cameras stand as sentinels over our roads. Here are the four main types you might encounter on your journeys: Red light cameras: Strategically placed at intersections, these cameras monitor for red light violations, capturing images or short videos of the offense to facilitate ticketing. Speed cameras: Designed to detect speed violations, these cameras, whether perched on poles or deployed in mobile units, record brief footage to identify and ticket speedsters. Traffic sensor cameras: Mounted atop traffic signals or poles, these cameras serve as the overseers of traffic flow, focusing on optimizing traffic light timings rather than recording incidents. Navigating the Limitations Understanding that traffic cameras do, indeed, record at times, we must also sail through the sea of limitations that may affect their utility in bolstering accident claims: Snapshots in Time: Most cameras only capture fleeting moments (typically, 12-second clips), which may miss the prelude to an accident. Narrow Gaze: Aimed primarily at capturing license plates, the field of vision of traffic cameras may not encompass the broader scenario of the accident, potentially omitting crucial contextual details. Ephemeral Evidence: In the wind like the leaves of autumn, video footage may only be stored for a brief period, emphasizing the importance of acting swiftly after an accident. Quest for Access: The treasure hunt to obtain footage can be daunting, as cameras may be owned by various entities, from individuals to the government, making it essential to know where to direct your efforts. The Value of Traffic Camera Recordings in Advocating for Accident Victims Despite their inherent limitations, traffic cameras can shine a light of undeniable truth onto the series of events that unfolded, highlighting: Traffic Violations: Evidence of transgressions such as speeding or running a red light from these cameras can decisively influence the establishment of fault. Visual Testimony: The power of visual evidence cannot be understated, offering a compelling narrative that can sway negotiations and court opinions. Deciphering the Unseen: For those involved in an accident, the sequence of events may be a blur; traffic camera footage can provide a clearer picture of what transpired. Navigating Your Journey to Justice Faced with the aftermath of a traffic incident in Charlotte County and wondering about the capturing capabilities of traffic cameras? Let Goldman, Tiseo & Sturges, P.A. illuminate the path ahead. Our deep-rooted connection to this community and its legal landscape positions us uniquely to assist you in unraveling the evidence necessary for your claim. If the road you travel seems fraught with uncertainty, remember, you're not journeying alone. Contact Goldman, Tiseo & Sturges, P.A. to anchor your trust in a team that navigates with precision, compassion, and a relentless pursuit of justice in Charlotte County and beyond.
Share by: